home · about · advertise
Corporate
Sponsors
Search:
advertisment  What's new in SolidWorks 2008?  Watch the demo here

TenLinks Partners

CADdepot
CADdigest
CADtalent
Innovate3D
FreeCAD
 upFront.eZine

News via Email
TenLinks Daily
CADdepot.com Update
CAD Digest  Weekly

NewsBreak

3D Systems FY06 Revenue Down to $134.8M, Q4 Down to $42.6M

See Also

 ·  3D Systems website
 ·  TenLinks Rapid Prototyping - Companies list
 ·  TenLinks CAM - Products and Companies list
 ·  related news

ROCK HILL, South Carolina, May 2, 2007 - 3D Systems Corporation (NASDAQ: TDSC), a leading provider of 3-D Modeling, Rapid Prototyping and Manufacturing solutions, announced today operating results for its fourth quarter and year ended December 31, 2006. The company’s reported fourth quarter results were in line with previously announced expectations. For a more detailed review of the company’s operating results and financial condition, please read the managements’ discussion and analysis in the company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, which was filed with the SEC today.

Operating Results

The fourth quarter results were as follows:

  • Revenue fell to $42.6 million from $44.0 million in the 2005 quarter, as restated, with $5 million of backlog at the end of 2006.
  • Operating loss was $5.3 million for the fourth quarter compared to $4.2 million of operating income in the 2005 quarter, as restated.
  • Net loss available to common stockholders was $6.0 million compared to $5.9 million of net income available to common stockholders in the 2005 quarter, as restated.
  • Loss per share was $0.31 on a fully diluted basis compared to $0.32 per share of net income on a fully diluted basis in the 2005 quarter, as restated.

For the full year, the company reported:

  • Revenue fell to $134.8 million from $139.1 million in 2005, as restated.
  • Revenue from materials increased to $52.1 million compared to $44.6 million in 2005, as restated.
  • Revenue from systems and other products decreased to $46.5 million in 2006 from $55.1 million in 2005, as restated.
  • Revenue from services decreased to $36.3 million from $39.3 million in 2005, as restated.
  • Operating loss was $25.7 million compared to $8.4 million of operating income in 2005, as restated.
  • Net loss available to common stockholders was $30.7 million for 2006 compared to $7.7 million of net income available to common stockholders in 2005, as restated.
  • Loss per share was $1.77 on a fully diluted basis compared to $0.48 per share of net income on a fully diluted basis in 2005, as restated.

Net losses in the 2006 periods included $2.5 million of non-cash income tax expense arising out of the recording of a valuation allowance during 2006, reversing, as a result of the company’s changed outlook, the non-cash benefit of the net deferred income tax asset that the company recorded at December 31, 2005.

“I am very pleased at long last to be able to share with you our 2006 financial results. I am very disappointed that it has taken us so long to do so,” said Abe Reichental, 3D Systems’ president and chief executive officer. Rest assured that we are working very hard to return to timely reporting of our operating results.

“As I have shared with you frequently throughout the past six months, last year was a very difficult and challenging year for us. As you know, during 2006, we executed a series of critical infrastructure and strategic projects, including the implementation of our new ERP system and our relocation to Rock Hill,” continued Reichental. “Although there is never a perfect time to embark on such a major business transformation, after extensive planning, we decided to make 2006 the year in which we would invest heavily in our company to give us the systems, facilities and products necessary to scale up and achieve the kind of sustained profitable growth to which we aspire.”

While the company experienced sequential improvements in its revenue during the third and fourth quarters of 2006, the revenue decreases for both the fourth quarter and the full year 2006 reflected the effects of the disruptions that it experienced beginning in the second quarter of 2006 from the execution of its infrastructure and strategic initiatives, including the implementation of its new ERP system, the outsourcing of warehousing and logistics functions, new systems’ stability issues, special customer accommodations, the relocation to Rock Hill and the costs incurred from its financial restatements. The 2006 revenue decline also reflects the company’s strategy of discontinuing the sale of certain legacy systems in favor of its newer manufacturing-capable systems, which are equipped with integrated materials cartridges.

Revenue increased by 35% over the company’s third-quarter 2006 revenue, continuing the sequential-quarter recovery that began in the third quarter of 2006 and reflecting the early impact of the corrective action plan that the company began to implement in July 2006.

Beyond their effect on consolidated revenue in 2006, these disruptions, initiatives, stability issues and resulting customer accommodations adversely affected the company’s operating performance beginning in the second quarter of 2006, and many of them continued to have some adverse effect on its operations in the third and fourth quarters of 2006.

The adverse effect of these factors eased toward the end of the third quarter of 2006 and that easing continued in the fourth quarter of 2006 as the company made progress in its remediation efforts and corrective action plan. The company believes that as it exited 2006 it has regained operational stability and incurred most of the costs associated with the above-mentioned disruptions.

Operating Highlights
Fourth Quarter and Full Year of 2006
($ in millions except for per share amounts)

Operating Highlights

Fourth Quarter

Full Year

2006

2005
Restated

% Change

2006 2005
Restated
% Change
Revenue $42.6 $44.0 (3%) $134.8 $139.1    (3%)
Gross profit
   
% of Revenue
$16.1
38%
$20.5
47%
  (21%) $46.3
34%
$62.2
45%
  (26%)
Operating expenses
   
% of Revenue
$21.4
50%
$16.3
37%
 31% $71.9
53%
$53.7
39%
    34%
Operating income (loss)
   
% of Revenue
($5.3)
NM
$4.2
10%
   
NM
$($25.7)
NM
$8.4
6%
NM
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders
   
% of Revenue
($6.0) NM $5.9
13%
NM $(30.7)
NM
$7.7

5%
NM
Diluted income (loss) per share available to common stockholders $(0.31) $0.32 NM $(1.77) $0.48 NM
Unrestricted cash $14.3 $24.3

(41%)

$14.3 $24.3 (41%)
Depreciation and amortization   
   
% of Revenue
$2.1
5%
$1.1
3%

(91%)

$6.5
 
5%
$5.9
4%

(10%)

NM = Not Meaningful “Revenue from sales of our engineered materials and composites continued to increase at a double-digit rate in 2006 while we continued to experience a decrease in revenue from legacy products and services,” commented Reichental.

“We also ended 2006 with a $5 million order backlog, primarily for systems and materials. I believe that these combined results reflect the operational recovery we have been making and more importantly the continued strong demand for our products, demonstrating that the strategic actions that we have taken in the past few years to transform our product portfolio and re-engineer our business model are taking effect.”

Revenue By Class of Product and Service
($ in millions)
Product or Service Fourth Quarter Full Year
2006 2005 Restated %
Change
2006 2005 Restated %
Change
Systems and other products $17.3 $21.5 (20%) $46.5 $55.1 (16%)
Materials $15.3 $12.8 20% $52.1 $44.6 17%
Services $10.0 $9.7 3% $36.3 $39.3 (8%)
Total $42.6 $44.0 (3%) $134.8 $139.1 (3%)

*Columns may not add due to rounding The $4.3 million decrease in consolidated revenue in 2006 compared to 2005 was primarily due to the disruptions and challenges mentioned above.

Reflecting the early success of its portfolio transformation strategy, revenue from materials increased by $7.5 million in 2006 primarily from higher unit volume and favorable price and mix effects. While revenue from systems and services declined by $11.6 million, sales of new products and services introduced since the latter part of 2003 increased by $7.0 million during 2006 to $49.2 million, representing more than 36% of revenue for the year.

“Notwithstanding the enormous challenges we encountered during 2006, we managed to deliver encouraging results,” said Reichental. “Despite all of the disruptions, our materials’ revenue increased some 17% over 2005 and at the end of 2006 represented some 39% of our annual revenue. We believe that the increased demand for our materials, even during this challenging period, is an early indication that our overall product portfolio transformation strategy is working.

“Our growing installed base, coupled with the integration of our new systems with proprietary materials cartridges and our continuum of expert solutions, should improve the profitability of our business as revenue from materials continues to outpace our growth in systems. Accordingly, the stability of our revenue base should improve as consumables’ sales rise as a percentage of the product mix relative to systems,” continued Reichental.

Gross profit for the fourth quarter of 2006 declined to $16.1 million from $20.5 million in the fourth quarter of 2005, as restated, and declined to $46.3 million from $62.2 million for the full year of 2005, as restated.

These declines in gross profit were due primarily to the combined effects of lower revenue and the ERP system, supply chain and logistics disruptions that the company encountered.

Residual special accommodations extended to certain customers as a result of the operating disruptions mentioned above continued to adversely affect gross profit in the fourth quarter. The impact of equipment stability and related resource training constraints eased toward the end of the fourth quarter of 2006, as the company made significant progress in its training and quality remediation efforts and corrective action plan. The company believes that its progress in remediating its new systems’ teething problems and training gaps resulted in greater market acceptance of its new systems as reflected in its backlog at the end of the fourth quarter.

Gross Profit Margins
($ in millions)
  Fourth Quarter Full Year
2006 2005 Restated %
Change
2006 2005 Restated %
Change
Products
   % Revenue
$14.2
44%
$17.5
51%
(19%) $39.3
40%
$49.4
50%
(20%)
Services
    % Revenue
$1.8
19%
$3.0
31%
(40%) $7.0
19%
$12.7
32%
(45%)

Total
    % Revenue

$16.1
38%
$20.5
47%
(21%) $46.3
34%
$62.2
45%
(26%)

*Columns may not add due to rounding

Gross profit margin on products decreased to 44% of consolidated product revenue in the fourth quarter of 2006 from 51% for the fourth quarter of 2005, as restated. Gross profit margin on products decreased to 40% of consolidated product revenue in 2006 from 50% in 2005, as restated. The decrease in margins was due primarily to the combined effects of lower revenue and the disruptions mentioned above.

Gross profit margin on services decreased to 19% of consolidated service revenue for the fourth quarter of 2006 from 31% of consolidated service revenue for the fourth quarter of 2005, as restated. Gross profit margin on services decreased to 19% of consolidated service revenue for the full year of 2006 from 32% of consolidated service revenue for the full year of 2005, as restated. Service margins in 2006 were adversely affected by disruptions in product availability, reduced sales volume of systems and temporarily increased installation costs. Service margins also suffered as a result of the company’s decision earlier in 2006 to discontinue servicing certain of its legacy systems and to cease selling certain upgrades to extend the use of legacy systems.

“Regretfully, implementation of our significant initiatives resulted in the temporary disruptions discussed above adversely affecting our ability to adequately support our customers. We believed that we had all the required resources in place to complete these activities smoothly. Clearly, in hindsight we did not,” added Reichental. “However, I am pleased to share with you that I believe we are transitioning to a point where our recent choices and their resulting new products and capabilities are now being validated by the very same customers who already are beginning to experience the difference and are responding favorably to our new products.”

Operating Expenses
($ in millions)
  Fourth Quarter Full Year
2006 2005 Restated %
Change
2006 2005 Restated %
Change
SG&A
  
$16.4
 
$11.7
 
40% $51.2
 
$40.3
 
27%
R&D
   
$4.0
 
$3.4
 
18% $14.1
 
$12.2
 
16%
Severance and restructuring
   
$1.0
 
$1.2
 
(17%) $6.6
 
$1.2
 
NM

Total
   

$21.4 $16.3
 
31% $71.9
 
$53.7
 
34%

*Columns may not add due to rounding NM = Not Meaningful Total operating expenses increased by $5.1 million to $21.4 million in the fourth quarter of 2006 compared to $16.3 million in the fourth quarter of 2005, as restated, and by $18.2 million to $71.9 million in the full year of 2006 compared to $53.7 million in the full year of 2005, as restated.

The increase in operating expenses for the full year was due primarily to $10.9 million of higher selling, general and administrative expenses, $5.4 million of higher severance and restructuring costs related to the relocation of the company’s headquarters to Rock Hill, South Carolina, which were generally in line with the company’s previously announced expectations, and $1.9 million of higher research and development expenses.

As the company previously disclosed, the higher research and development expenses in each period related to the company’s continuing high level of new product development work, primarily related to its accelerated work on the development of additional desktop 3-D Modelers, including the recently announced V-Flash™ Desktop Modeler, and other Rapid Manufacturing solutions as well as its previously announced research and development agreement with Symyx Technologies, Inc.

The severance and restructuring costs related to the relocation of the company’s headquarters to Rock Hill constituted approximately one third of the increase in operating expenses in 2006.

The higher selling, general and administrative expenses in 2006 resulted mostly from higher consulting expenses primarily related to the company’s ERP system and relocation projects and its higher accounting fees and internal expenses related to its restatement activities, higher bad debt expense, higher depreciation and amortization expense, non-cash equity compensation expense related to unvested options and stock-based compensation expense relating to previously granted stock options.

“During 2006, we continued to fund infrastructure investments as well as the abnormal costs we incurred in connection with remedying the disruptions we incurred and our restatement activities. We ended the year with $14.3 million of unrestricted cash, of which $8.2 million was drawn against our bank credit facility that comes due at the beginning of July 2007, and we expect to begin work on renewing or replacing that facility shortly. Our year-end cash position reflects in part our continued efforts to improve our working capital management, which included a further reduction in our days sales outstanding in the fourth quarter of 2006,” said Reichental.

“Notwithstanding all of the challenges we experienced in 2006, we reflect on the year with mixed emotions — pride for our overall achievements and for the strong momentum with which we ended the year, and disappointment for the operating losses and the unintended consequences leading to restatements of our financials. I firmly believe that by taking the bold and difficult steps we executed during this past year, we are well positioned for the future,” added Reichental.

“Despite the disappointments that we encountered in 2006, we managed to make significant progress in many areas as we continued to invest in infrastructure, products, people and capabilities to achieve our strategic objectives.

Specifically, since the beginning of 2006:

  • We stabilized and enhanced the performance of our Viper Pro SLA and Sinterstation Pro SLS Systems, two significant, new-from-the-ground-up Rapid Manufacturing solutions.
  • We introduced an integrated digital dentistry 3-D Modeling System, the InVision Dental Pro (DP).
  • We introduced several revolutionary engineered materials and composites.
  • We continued outsourcing non-core activities such as spare parts’ distribution, resulting in improved next-day service to our customers.
  • We continued pruning our older products, including curtailing development and sale of upgrades to legacy systems.
  • We expanded our network of systems’ outsourcing partners and suppliers to include materials and service providers.
  • We broadened our strategic alliances with several key industry players and research universities globally.
  • We invested heavily in strategic and tactical R&D — increasing R&D costs to approximately $14.1 million — as part of our commitment to improve overall customer success.
  • We consolidated our corporate headquarters into a new facility in Rock Hill, S.C., to enhance our effectiveness and customer responsiveness and to reduce overall costs.
  • We created a state-of-the-art Rapid Manufacturing Center (RMC) to showcase our product line and an advanced research and development center.
  • We completed the development of our world-class 3D Systems University in partnership with York Technical College to provide training to our customers, resellers and employees.
  • We implemented a new ERP system in order to streamline our operations, enhance customer service and provide more timely and effective management information.
  • We stepped up remediation efforts to achieve effective controls across all functions and geographies in which we operate. "As we look ahead, we are confident in the fundamentals of our business model and in our strengthening industry leadership position through even stronger and more comprehensive technological leadership. Our transformed business model, renewed organizational strength and expanded global presence underscore our strong commitment to improve our customers’ success.

We believe that the majority of our operational issues have been resolved successfully. We remain confident in our overall direction and expect that the key initiatives and investments that we undertook throughout 2006 will provide us with the right platform to achieve our long-term objectives," concluded Reichental.

Conference Call and Audio Webcast Details

3D Systems will hold a conference call and audio Webcast to discuss its fourth quarter and full year 2006 financial results tomorrow morning, Tuesday, May 1, at 8:30 a.m. Eastern Time.

  • To access the Conference Call, dial 1-888-336-3485 (or 706-634-0653 from outside the United States). A recording will be available two hours after completion of the call for three days. To access the recording, dial 1-800-642-1687 (or 706-645-9291 from outside the United States) and enter 7803123, the conference call ID number.
  • To access the audio Webcast, log onto 3D Systems’ website at www.3dsystems.com. The link to the Webcast is provided on the homepage of the website. To ensure timely participation and technical capability, we recommend logging on a few minutes prior to the conference call to activate your participation. The Webcast will be available for replay beginning approximately 48 hours after completion of the call at: www.3dsystems.com under the Investor Relations’ section.

About 3D Systems Corporation

3D Systems is a leading provider of 3-D Modeling, Rapid Prototyping and Manufacturing solutions. Its systems and materials reduce the time and cost of designing products and facilitate direct and indirect manufacturing by creating actual parts directly from digital input. These solutions are used for design communication and prototyping as well as for production of functional end-use parts: Transform your products.

More information on the company is available at www.3dsystems.com,  or via email at moreinfo@3dsystems.com.

--------

If news like this is important to you, sign up for our TenLinks Daily at www.tenlinks.com/NEWS/sub_unsub.htm.

Related News

May 22 - 3D Systems Launches Material Evaluation Website
May 22 - SensAble Selects 3D Systems ProJet DP 3D Printer
May 22 - SensAble Selects 3D Systems ProJet DP 3D Printer
May 21 - US Automaker Buys 2nd 3D Systems Sinterstation System
May 19 - Acu-Cast Buys 3D Systems Viper Pro SLA
Apr 22 - 3D Systems Delivers Accura Materials in Japan
Apr 9 - Japan's Nihon Weed Buys 3D Systems Sinterstation Pro SLS
Apr 9 - Japan's Nihon Weed Buys 3D Systems Sinterstation Pro SLS
Apr 2 - 3D Systems Ships V-Flash Desktop Modeler
Mar 18 - 3D Systems Q4 Revenue Up 6% to $45M with $1.4M Profit
Mar 4 - 3D Systems to Collaborate with TRIAL for Laser Sintering
Feb 29 - Sirona Selects 3D Systems InVision DP 3D Modeler
Feb 11 - APP Selects 3D Systems Accura
Feb 4 - 3D Systems Launches Direct Metal Laser Sintering Systems
Jan 22 - 3D Systems to Launch ProJet DP 3000 3D Printer
Jan 8 - 3D Systems to Launch ProJet HD3000 3D Printer
Jan 8 - APP Buys 3D Systems Viper Pro SLA
Dec 17 - 3D Systems to Present at Needham Conference
Dec 6 - 3D Systems Announces Nanocomposite for SLA
Oct 23 - 3D Systems' Q3 FY 2007 Conference Call on Nov 2, 9AM ET
Oct 16 - FineLine Becomes 3D Systems 'Preferred Service Provider'
Oct 10 - 400 Attend 3D Systems World Conference
Oct 10 - Acu-Cast Buys 3D Systems Viper Pro SLA System
Oct 9 - Reebok Adopts 3D Systems DuraForm Flex Plastic
Sep 27 - 3D Systems Releases LS 3.44, OptiScan for SLS Systems
Sep 27 - 3D systems Launches DuraForm HST Plastic for SLS Systems
Sep 27 - 3D Systems Offers Accura 48HTR Rapid Prototype Plastic
Sep 27 - 3D Systems to Offer Self-Maintenance Courses
Sep 26 - 3D Systems Delivers Software for Viper Pro SLA
Sep 25 - 3D Systems Claims Viper Pro SLA Installed in 13 Countries
Sep 25 - 3D Systems Launches V-Flash Desktop Modeler
Sep 25 - 3D Systems Introduces DuraForm EX Black Plastic
Sep 18 - 3D Systems CEO Named Ambassador for Economic...
Aug 7 - 3D Systems Q2 Revenue Up 34% to $36M But Loses $5.3M
Jul 30 - 3D Systems University Offers InVision 3-D Modeling Course
Jul 24 - 3D Systems Announces Accura Xtreme Plastic
Jul 24 - 3D Systems Converts 6% Debentures into Common Stock
Jul 3 - 3D Systems Launches Accura 55 Plastic
Jul 3 - 3D Systems Extends Loan Agreement with Silicon Valley Bank
Jun 22 - 3D Systems Calls for Redemption of Convertible Debentures
Jun 21 - 3D Systems Announces Private Placement of Common Stock
Jun 06 - 3D Systems Selects Canon to Manufacture V-Flash Desktop...
Jun 5 - 3D Systems Fixes NASDAQ Deficiency
May 31 - National RP 3D Systems Service Provider
May 31 - 3D Systems Q1 Revenue Up 9.8% to $37M but Loses $3M
May 22 - 3D Systems Receives NASDAQ Delisting Notice
May 14 - 3D Systems Delays Filing, Q1 Loss May Exceed $2M
May 7 - 3D Systems Cures NASDAQ Deficiency
May 2 - 3D Systems FY06 Revenue Down to $134.8M, Q4 Down to...
May 1 - 3D Systems Launches InVision XT 3-D Modeler at RAPID
Apr 20 - 3D Systems Appoints Damon Gregoire as VP, CFO
Apr 18 - 3D Systems to Hold Investor Day on May 1 in Detroit
Apr 09 - 3D Systems Receives NASDAQ Delisting Notice
Mar 28 - 3D Systems to Offer Fractional Ownership of RP Systems
Mar 19 - 3D Systems Introduces Accura 55 Plastic for SLA Systems
Mar 16 - Tangible Express Purchases 10 3D Systems SLA, SLS Systems
Feb 16 - 3D Systems Continues to be Listed on NASDAQ
Feb 15 - 3D Systems CFO Fred Jones to Retire
Feb 7 - 3D Systems Plans 1st User Meeting in September
Feb 5 - 3D Systems Q3 Revenue Down 2% to $31.5M, Net Loss of...
Jan 18 - 3D Systems Opens Global Headquarters at Rock Hill, SC
Jan 18 - 3D Systems to Hold Conference Call on Investor Day

Source: Material used in press releases is often supplied by external sources and used as is.

feedback - newsletters - privacy statement - suggest a site - terms of service
Copyright © 2008 by TenLinks, Inc. All rights reserved.